Step 2: Check the Reasoning

In critical thinking, reasoning is the backbone of any argument. It’s not enough to accept conclusions at face value; you need to ensure that the logic connecting the dots is solid, clear, and free from hidden pitfalls. In this step, we teach you to analyze arguments like a seasoned logician, separating well-built reasoning from those that could collapse under scrutiny.

Identify the Core Argument

Every argument has a central point, even if it’s buried under layers of details, qualifiers, or distracting language. Start by pinpointing the main claim or conclusion that the argument is trying to make. Ask yourself: What’s the main point here, in one sentence? Then look for the main reasons or evidence supporting that point.

In this step, you’re stripping the argument down to its essentials. Once you’ve identified the core claim, you can evaluate if the surrounding information is helping support it or simply adding fluff.

Start by identifying the main point or conclusion the argument is trying to make. Strip away any fluff or extra details until you have the core message.
Look at the claims the author uses to support this conclusion. Are they direct, relevant, and clear? This “big picture” step helps you see if the argument even has a clear point or if it’s hiding behind vagueness.

Look for Logical Connections and Structure

A well-constructed argument should have a clear, logical path leading from one point to the next, guiding the audience naturally toward the conclusion. Analyze how each claim is linked. Does one point lead directly to the next, creating a cohesive chain of reasoning? Or does it jump or rely on vague connections?

This step is crucial for spotting “gaps” in the logic where the argument leaps from one idea to the next without sufficient support. A common issue is the unsupported assumption: when the argument takes something for granted without offering evidence.

Straw Man: Misrepresenting an opposing viewpoint to make it easier to counter.
Ad Hominem: Attacking the person instead of the argument.
False Dilemma: Presenting a situation as having only two choices when there may be more.

Identify Common Logical Fallacies

Logical fallacies are like hidden traps—they can make an argument sound convincing even when it’s flawed. Here are some of the most common ones:

Straw Man: Misrepresenting an opposing viewpoint to make it easier to counter.
Ad Hominem: Attacking the person instead of the argument.
False Dilemma: Presenting a situation as having only two choices when there may be more.

Evaluate the Evidence and Assumptions

Strong reasoning rests on solid evidence. Review any supporting data, examples, or research presented. Is it relevant, credible, and directly related to the argument? Sometimes, the evidence provided only partially supports the argument or isn’t as strong as it first appears.

Also, look out for hidden assumptions—things that the argument takes for granted. For example, an argument might assume that “all people prefer freedom over security” without actually proving it. Ask yourself, If this assumption is wrong, would the entire argument fall apart? If the answer is yes, then it’s worth questioning its validity.

Good reasoning relies on strong evidence, not just assumptions. Look closely at the evidence provided. Is it factual, recent, and relevant to the claims being made?
Identify any hidden assumptions—ideas that are taken for granted but are essential to the argument. Ask yourself: If this assumption is wrong, would the entire argument fall apart? If so, it’s critical to examine it.

Test for Bias in Reasoning

Even subtle biases can color the reasoning within an argument. This could be cultural bias, personal bias, or even an unintentional bias toward a particular outcome. A biased argument might selectively present evidence or frame certain points to steer you toward a pre-determined conclusion.

Ask yourself: Does the argument seem one-sided? Is it ignoring other possible viewpoints? Good reasoning is fair and objective, weighing evidence from multiple perspectives rather than cherry-picking points that support a single stance.

Reasoning can be subtly influenced by personal or cultural biases. Be on the lookout for loaded language, selective evidence, or arguments that feel emotionally charged rather than logically consistent.
Ask yourself: Is this reasoning consistent and fair, or does it seem to skew in a way that benefits the author’s perspective?

Look for Alternative Explanations

Finally, good reasoning doesn’t shy away from complexity. It considers other potential explanations or outcomes. A strong argument should acknowledge alternative perspectives and explain why they might be less likely or relevant.

Ask: Could there be other ways to interpret this evidence? Are there other logical conclusions that could be drawn? An argument that ignores plausible alternatives might be oversimplified or biased, aiming to “win” rather than engage in genuine exploration of the truth.

Good reasoning considers multiple perspectives. Are there other explanations or conclusions that could be drawn from the evidence? If the argument ignores alternative views without addressing them, it may lack depth.
Considering alternative explanations not only strengthens your understanding of the argument but also makes you less susceptible to being swayed by a one-sided view.

Why Is This Step So Important?

Checking the reasoning isn’t just about spotting flaws; it’s about strengthening your ability to follow, question, and understand any argument. In The Thinker’s House, we train you to not only spot errors but to think through them. After mastering this step, you’ll be able to dissect complex arguments confidently and make decisions that aren’t just informed—but unshakeable.

Builds a Strong Foundation for Decision-Making

Reliable information is the cornerstone of sound decisions. By carefully researching sources, you ensure your conclusions are based on facts rather than misconceptions, rumors, or persuasive tactics.

Prevents Manipulation and Misinformation

In an era where information can be easily spun, twisted, or misrepresented, knowing how to assess a source protects you from being misled by biased reporting, hidden agendas, or outright falsehoods.

Increases Confidence in Your Knowledge

When you know your sources are credible, you can communicate and defend your views with confidence. This step bolsters your authority in discussions and debates, making your insights more persuasive and well-founded.

Sharpens Analytical Skills for Lifelong Learning

Regularly assessing sources enhances your analytical abilities. Over time, this habit fine-tunes your instincts to question, investigate, and validate any information you encounter, creating a mindset geared toward lifelong learning and growth.